In the extra ordinary form, the sub deacon would actually use a humeral veil to transfer the chalice from the credence to the altar.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cfe4/4cfe4b4eef19268a176dda4ade85cbca1f80be65" alt=""
The sacred vessels should be treated with reverence and not handled by just anyone, but of coarse people have to face facts sometimes. Gloves are something I'll wear when I'm a bishop (please God no), but not when a humble server.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d3b3/2d3b39c5c15ad5ebcc5c4e0b46ca52d8a7be14ca" alt=""
Pontifical Mass celebrated by Bishop Peter Elliot / _DSC0023
Copyright 2007 John Casamento Photography
On a curios side not about gloves, the symbolic meaning of the bishop's gloves is the purity of his hands, to let nothing ungodly stain them, the argument for the use of gloves by the servers is quite the contrary, that the server's have stained hands, thus they need to wear gloves, very interesting.
Copyright 2007 John Casamento Photography
On a curios side not about gloves, the symbolic meaning of the bishop's gloves is the purity of his hands, to let nothing ungodly stain them, the argument for the use of gloves by the servers is quite the contrary, that the server's have stained hands, thus they need to wear gloves, very interesting.
2 comments:
But who today remembers that an ordinary person shouldn't handle sacred vessels and uses a purifier? That is why I like the use of gloves because it makes the act obviouse and also it makes people think. Gloves are very much visible, while if a server were to just use a purifier who would notice such a small and short act?
That's just my opinion.
+irena
The people who notice it most in my experience are children. Parents always say that their children were "fascinated" by the gloves. At least it does a lot of good.
Post a Comment